The importance of labeling genetically engineered food
Reasons why gmos should be labeled essay
Voluntary labeling has not been sufficient for informing consumers about the presence of GM ingredients. Given that genetic engineering can produce a wide variety of outcomes both positive and negative , simple GM food labels are not likely to allow most consumers to differentiate products in the manner they most desire and could actually hurt those consumers who would be willing to accept GM content when there are GM-linked benefits. In This Article. Consumers' resistance to genetically modified foods in high income countries: The role of information in an uncertain environment D. Improving the nutrient content of food through genetic modification: Evidence from experimental auctions on consumer acceptance. Huffman, W. Support for GE increased the probability of not using the label and decreased the probability of the label information being used to reveal preference through purchase. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78 5 : — Byrne, D. Therefore, the method of development is not considered material information required to be disclosed in the labeling of foods under U. While we have different reasons for wanting to know what is in our food, the one thing no one should deny is our right to know. Link, B. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 34 3 : — The use of biotechnology in food production can have multidimensional effects on product quality; some consumers may want to know about some or all of these changes.
Conceptualizing stigma. The data used in this study are cross sectional, thus this analysis is limited in the extent to which any kinds of causal links can be determined.
Labelling of genetically modified foods
Food businesses may be able to provide this information. Washington, DC: Author. These could vary significantly depending upon the terms and conditions of the requirements that are imposed. For a small percentage of respondents, labels were a signal that influenced preferences and purchase behaviors. For example, if a new GM food includes a protein that may be an allergen not expected to be present such as a peanut protein expressed in a soybean , then it would have to be labeled. Gregory, and J. To check for sensitivity and the robustness of the results and to test the validity of the assumptions underlying the difference-in-difference estimate, the table reports results from five model specifications.
Kerr, and G. Risk assessment is further challenged by the highly complex web of regulatory review, which involves three government agencies and dozens of departments with competing interests that render government oversight practically toothless.
Agriculture and Human Values 35 2 : — Estimated probability at data means.
Should genetically modified food be sold with a warning label
Teisl, M. Risk Analysis, 13 6 , Lesser, W. Companies may voluntarily label foods produced without genetic modification, and foods labeled USDA Organic are produced without genetic modification. Mandatory genetic engineering labels and consumer autonomy. Additionally, while at the present time foods produced using GE have not been found to harm health, there is an emergence of literature highlighting shortcomings in research about the benefits of GE on society Catacora-Vargas et al. More information on fair trade legislation is available from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission and New Zealand Commerce Commission websites. Farmers joining state efforts against bioengineered crops.
This Non-GMO logo enables consumers to exercise this right! In This Article. Because there are no laws mandating that these ingredients must be labeled as genetically modified, consumers are most likely unknowingly consuming genetically modified ingredients. This study was completed in only one US state.
This is a serious conflict of interest that brings into question the validity of safety assurances from the government. Hoban, T.
Gmo food labeling
For example, additional labelling is required for high lysine corn which indicates that it has been genetically modified to contain increased levels of lysine. As the US government moves forward with the implementation of the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard, our results show that, for a slight majority of respondents who indicated they used the labels with simple disclosures, labels were an informational source that helped with decision making. No endorsement of products mentioned is intended nor is criticism implied of products not mentioned. The biotechnology communication paradox: Experimental evidence and the need for a new strategy. Whether the intended use of the GM food is different to the existing counterpart non-GM food. This figure is similar to that found by Christoph et al. Table 1 reports the results associated with key variables of interest in this study. Mandatory labeling will allow consumers to identify and steer clear of types of food products that they wish to avoid. Food label use and its relation to dietary intake among US adults. The safety of the consumers should be the primary goal and given the lack of evidence that will persuade us in either way, the labels should be obligatory. Using informational labeling to influence the market for quality in food products. Everything including bread, cereal, frozen pizza, soup, soda—all sorts of processed foods—now contain genetically engineered ingredients. Publics' opinions about biotechnologies. World Health Organization.
In most labeling proposals that have been advanced or approved, foods sold via food service and restaurants are excluded. If the food is unpackaged, then the information must accompany or be displayed with the food. The informational and signaling impacts of labels: Experimental evidence from India on GM foods.
based on 111 review